Write an essay in which you explain how Jimmy Carter builds an argument to persuade his
audience that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry. In
your essay, analyze how Carter uses one or more of the features listed above (or features of
your own choice) to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument. Be sure that
your analysis focuses on the most relevant features of the passage.
Your essay should not explain whether you agree with Carter's claims, but rather explain
how Carter builds an argument to persuade his audience.

Which characteristic is common to memoirs? a. they analyze all sides of a particular issue. b. they give the entire life story of an author. c. they may include fictional characters. d. they are written in first-person point of view.

She took up a scalpel and slit the monkey's abdomen, making a slow and gentle cut, keeping the blade well away from her gloved fingers. the spleen was puffed up and tough, leathery, like a globe of smoked salami. she did not see any bloody lesions inside this monkey. she had expected that the monkey's interior would be a lake of blood, but no, this monkey looked all right, it had not bled into itself. if the animal had died of ebola, this was not a clear case. she opened up the intestine. there was no blood inside it. the gut looked okay. then she examined the stomach. there she found a ring of bleeding spots at the junction between the stomach and the small intestine. this could be a sign of ebola, but it was not a clear sign. it could also be a sign of simian fever, not ebola. therefore, she could not confirm the presence of ebola virus in this animal based on a visual inspection of the internal organs during necropsy.

Why is the use of summary particularly when analyzing dramatic works?