Debbie is writing a paper about author John Steinbeck. What must she do regardless of whether she quotes or paraphrases the evidence from
her primary and secondary sources?
She should provide context for the evidence and explain how it's connected to the claim.
She should ask readers to refer to the sources for more information about the topic.
She should include all sources in her bibliography and use in-text citations to reference them in
her paper.
She should set the evidence cited apart by using separate lines or quotation marks.
She should provide footnotes with additional information to further support the evidence.

She should include all sources in her bibliography and use in-text citations to reference them in  her paper.

Explanation:

Whenever information from another source is used, regardless of whether it's a primary or secondary source or if the information is paraphrased or directly quoted, it's always important to include the citations of where the information was found to give credit to those authors.

Here, Debbie needs to provide a bibliography, which is essentially a list of books that the author referenced in his/her paper, as well as in-text citations; for example (Smith 90) if the author cited had a last name of Smith and the information was found on page 90.

Thus the answer is C.

i think the answer is hope it

i don't really know the circumstances. i personally think not due to it not being fair for all parties and how hated i'd become if i thought it was a good thing.