Art movements are trends in art style that follow a certain idea or philosophy1. Art movements influence decorative art like interior design, fashion, and furniture, as well as architecture and painting. Art Deco was an art movement that began in the 1920s and became very popular in the United States and Europe by the 1930s. This movement conveyed the grandness of the ''Roaring Twenties,'' a period of prosperity and scientific progress. It used geometric patterns, bold colors, and sleek, simple shapes. In the beginning, the Art Deco movement used expensive materials like silver, jade, and rock crystal to reflect the thriving economy. Artists like Tamara De Lempicka used bold colors and precise lines in her work. Later, when the economy experienced a slowdown, Art Deco designers used cheaper materials such as bakelite, the first plastic made entirely from artificial compounds, to create elegant and practical designs. This movement disappeared by the early 1940s because many people considered the art style gaudy. In the 1950s, the Pop Art movement began in the United States and England. This movement conveyed the confidence of the "Swinging Sixties," a period of social freedom and modern ideas. Pop Art used images of ordinary objects, such as soup cans, as subjects for the paintings. The movement simplified fine art and appealed to everyone. Andy Warhol, a well-known artist of this era, painted ordinary objects in bright color schemes in his paintings. He also created paintings in comic book style. As the economy prospered, Pop Art designers used materials like plastic to create commercially successful products. By the 1960s, this art movement had reached its peak. This movement faded by the 1970s as the world experienced political unrest. This movement influenced the Neo-Pop art movement of the 1980s.
1. the most basic concepts or beliefs 10 Which response best paraphrases Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 2?
A. Art Deco was an art movement that began in the 1920s but disappeared by the 1940s because people decided they did not like the gaudy art style.
B. Art Deco was a popular art movement that began in the 1920s during a booming economy. The era was reflected in the decorative patterns, colors, and shapes used in the fashion, furniture, and architectural designs of the Art Deco era.
C. The Art Deco movement used expensive materials like silver, jade, and rock crystal to reflect the thriving economy but later had to switch to cheaper materials like bakelite because the economy changed.
D. Art Deco was an art movement that influenced decorative art like interior design, fashion, and furniture, as well as architecture and painting.

2: "jesse kept on, his voice rising in anger."

4: "andy stormed out angrily."

i answered the question and it said these two were right : )

i hope this

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this

u don't know that wow good luck tho bud

a

explanation: