Charles Darwin and Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck both proposed theories to explain how populations change over time. Consider the statements below and indicate whether they are components of either or both theories. Natural theology is an acceptable alternative explanation in cases where evolutionary explanations are not yet available Darwin's theory Lamarck's theory O neither Darwin nor Lamarck's theory both Darwin and Lamarck's theory The main mechanism of evolution is natural selection Darwin's theory Lamarck's theory neither Darwin nor Lamarck's theory both Darwin and Lamarck's theory Species are fixed Darwin's theory Lamarck's theory neither Darwin nor Lamarck's theory both Darwin and Lamarck's theory The environment creates favorable characteristics on demand Darwin's theory Lamarck's theory O neither Darwin nor Lamarck's theory both Darwin and Lamarck's theory The interaction of organisms with their environment is important in the evolutionary process. Darwin's theory Lamarck's theory O neither Darwin nor Lamarck's theory both Darwin and Lamarck's theory

The arctic national wildlife refuge is home to caribou, moose, musk oxen, wolves, foxes, grizzlies, polar bears and migratory birds. leaders in the oil industry believe the refuge is the perfect site for the “environmentally sensitive exploration” of oil. environmentalists are wondering: what will become of the wildlife? president george w. bush, oil-industry leaders and others believe that americans will benefit from the oil that lies under the snow-filled surface of the refuge. in their opinion, the oil will reduce high fuel prices and decrease our need for oil from other countries. i believe the cost of such drilling is too high. i agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou. each spring, the caribou travel 400 miles to give birth on the coastal plain. in this area of the refuge, there are fewer predators. in addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply. is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to these animals? americans are the largest consumers of oil. instead of drilling for oil, we should decrease our need for foreign oil simply by using less. we must all work together to cut back on the oil we use in order to preserve the wildlife of the arctic national wildlife refuge. what type of argument is used in this paragraph? i believe the cost of such drilling is too high. i agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou. each spring, the caribou travel 400 miles to give birth on the coastal plain. in this area of the refuge, there are fewer predators. in addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply. is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to these animals? a. appeal to emotion c. appeal to logic b. bandwagon d. none of the above select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d