How do i summarize this? Figuring out whether someone is guilty of a crime
isn't a straightforward task. Juries are often asked
to reach a verdict in the face of unreliable
eyewitness testimony and contradicting evidence.
That ambiguity can lead to a shocking number of
wrongful convictions, as dissections of high-
profile trials in the NPR podcast Serial and the
Netflix documentary Making a Murderer reveal.

Highlinght the ideas and go from there.

Explanation: This is what i got

It's not easy determining whether someone is guilty. Juries have to work through opposing evidences to reach their conclusions. The contrast caused between the points of view of witnesess, and testimony can often lead to false conclusions. many events like this can be seen on tv.

i wonder if it is possible to place reagans testimony and paragragh 18, so we can compare and contract the ideas in the text.