English, 22.04.2020 21:00, brandiwingard

PLEASE HURRY ASAP

SOURCE 1: Rafters of Nostalgia is a strange movie that I hated from beginning to end. For one, the opening scene is not really a scene at all because the camera just focuses on an old urn resting in the corner of a dusty cottage for a good 10 minutes. No actors, no action, no nothing. Just urn. BORING!

SOURCE 2: Rafters of Nostalgia is a work of quiet genius that defies trends in modern movies. You won't see any explosions or superheroes here. Its opening scene forces the viewer to gaze upon an urn sitting in the corner of a house for an uncomfortable 10 minutes, providing an exhilarating opportunity to question the decreasing attention span of modern life.
Which statement best synthesizes information from both sources?
1 of 3 QUESTIONS
A person who wants a unique movie-watching experience should watch Rafters of Nostalgia.
A person who wants to take a significant other to a movie should avoid Rafters of Nostalgia.
A person who wants to be challenged by a work of genius should watch Rafters of Nostalgia.
A person who wants to actually enjoy going to the movies should avoid Rafters of Nostalgia.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: English

English, 21.06.2019 22:00, leah7378

Read this excerpt from the lady of shalott by alfred, lord tennyson. in which three lines does the poet reveal the monotomy of the lady’s existence

Answers: 1

continue

English, 22.06.2019 02:40, SMNS625

Constructing an argument: in modern american society, the legalization of marijuana continues to be controversial and hotly debated. some people find it contradictory that certain "drugs"—such as tobacco and alcohol—are legalized even though they pose proven health risks, while marijuana, which has many medicinal applications, continues to be illegal by the federal government. what reasons do you think the federal government gives for outlawing marijuana, and do the reasons support the conclusion?

Answers: 2

continue

English, 22.06.2019 03:40, gmoney1973

Buckminster boy. she glared at him. "lizzie, i swear to you, as sure as i'm standing right here—that's a lie. every bit of it. every single bit." "my granddaddy said it was a lie, too." she leaned her head to one side and looked at him steadily. "so why haven't you been down to the island? " "so only you get to ask questions now? " "yes." she waited. "i haven't been down to the island because my father believes that you were using me to you stay on malaga island." "well," she said slowly. "well." "i didn't believe it, either." the sea breeze lay at their feet panting, hoping they would play with it again. based on what turner and lizzie say, which is the best conclusion that can be drawn? they are angered by the lies the adults have been spreading. neither of them is able to fully trust what the other is claiming. each trusts the other and cares a great deal about their friendship. both are worried about the troubles their friendship may bring.

Answers: 2

continue

English, 22.06.2019 08:00, snikergrace

The following question is based on your reading of a midsummer night’s dream by william shakespeare. why are the royals in the woods? a. they are hunting. c. they are drunk. b. they are celebrating the wedding. d. they are lost.

Answers: 3

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

PLEASE HURRY ASAP

SOURCE 1: Rafters of Nostalgia is a strange movie that I hated from be...