Maggie has decided on an informative speech on the topic of dreaming. She finds three different articles that cover areas that she believes will be of interest to her audience. Although she credits these sources in her written citation page, she imports intact the ideas and support from these sources as her speech's main ideas and supporting material. Which of the following statements best pertains to this situation?
A) There is no ethical violation here, as she has credited these sources on the outline.
B) There is no ethical violation here, as long as the ideas work well together.
C) There is an ethical violation here known as patchwork plagiarism.
D) There is an ethical violation here, as speakers must have more than three sources.

There is an ethical violation here known as patchwork plagiarism.

Explanation:

From the question; she imports intact the ideas and support from these sources as her speech's main ideas and supporting material.

The bold text above means she imports the ideas from these text wholly or completely. This known as plagiarism and definitely, an ethical violation has occurred irrespective of whether or not she credited the sources.

The term Plagiarism includes the following

Apparently, Maggie is guilty of (1) and (2) above. With these two violations, it's right to conclude that there is an ethical violation here known as patchwork plagiarism.

what passage

explanation:

the answer:

in the first part of the story running is all that matters to squeaky. running gives her confidence and defines who she is. at the beginning of the story she says that other kids call her mercury because she runs very fast. in the text she refers to herself as "miss quicksilver".

the line that provides the best evidence that squeaky has self-confidence is

" and i continue with my breathing exercise, strolling down broadway toward the ice cream man on 145th with not a care in the world cause i am miss quicksilver herself".