Read the excerpt from the Supreme Court’s decision in Hirabayashi v. United States. Hirabayashi challenged the mass evacuation of Japanese Americans on the West Coast, stating that the evacuation was based solely on suspicion. Which sentence best summarizes the court’s opinion?
It is true that we might now say that there was ample time to handle the problem on the individual rather than the group basis. But military decisions must be made without the benefit of hindsight. The orders must be judged as of the date when the decision to issue them was made. To say that the military in such cases should take the time to weed out the loyal from the others would be to assume that the nation could afford to have them take the time to do it. But as the opinion of the Court makes clear, speed and dispatch may be of the essence. Certainly we cannot say that those charged with the defense of the nation should have procrastinated until investigations and hearings were completed. At that time further delay might indeed have seemed to be wholly incompatible with military responsibilities.
Since we cannot override the military judgment which lay behind these orders, it seems to me necessary to concede that the army had the power to deal temporarily with these people on a group basis. Petitioner therefore was not justified in disobeying the orders.

A.
Legal procedure and civil rights can be scrapped when the nation faces a war threat.
B.
Mass Japanese relocation was justified because there was no time to separate the guilty from the innocent.
C.
Japanese Americans who challenged the exclusion orders failed to understand the military’s dilemma.
D.
Military decisions should have been taken after the investigations were completed.