In the sixteenth century, the English man of war was a new kind of weapon that allowed Britain to rule a vast empire. over 200 feet long, it had three masts and could carry up to 124 guns:4 at the front,8 at the back, and 56 on each side. all these guns required three cannon decks to hold them.

what can the reader infer about this paragraph?
A) tiny Britain ruled a vast empire
B) cannons take up a lot of room
C) the English had a large navy
D) the man of war was a warship

showing or suffering from nervousness, fear, or a lack of confidence

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.

can you take a picture of the passage so i can answer your question

ankara s dndkslqnebd