Passage:DARK HISTORY OF RWANDA'S GENOCIDE

I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

How do Steve Inskeep’s observations of Rwanda’s democracy compare to Louise Mushikiwabo’s opinions?

Explanation: Inskeep is the interviewer and Mushikiwabo is the Rwandan Foreign Minister. It had been 20 years since the genocide of the Tutsi minority had been killed by the Hutu majority. Neighbors were encouraged to kill neighbors with the weapon of choice being machetes. In questioning Mushikiwabo, Inskeep questions what will happen in Rwanda when the current Constitution expires- will another genocide occur? Mushikiwabo chooses to discuss the great progress for Rwanda of the past 20 years following the genocide. The economy is stable, they do have elections and the country has made great advancements. When Inskeep inquires as to those individuals who committed atrocities who still remain in Rwanda and what their fate should be, Mushikiwabo responds by saying it cannot be justice versus reconciliation, but rather justice and reconciliation, thus those individuals will simply go free in an attempt to maintain stability.

                     Inskeeps perception of democracy is a more pure form, a government by the people, ad of the people. Mushikiwabo's view is one in which because of the genocide, although the people are consulted, to maintain the "stability" of Rwanda, it is important for the government and state to remain control of most political actions.  

the play romeo and juliet was one of the most famous love tragedies ever written. this love story unfortunately had a fatal ending. many people argue over why the lovers had died, was it over free will or fate?  

the death of romeo and juliet was partially because of free will. the fact that romeo and juliet got married knowing that there was a bitter feud between their families, the montague and capulet’s. this feud brought on many problems, such as the murder of tybalt by romeo. juliet knew that this might be a problem for her and romeo. juliet had said: “what’s in a name”? which explains her ill fate of being a capulet and romeo being a montague. when romeo tells his servant “ ay, mine own…show more content…

i believe they had died over the love they had for each other, strong enough that their lives could end so suddenly if something horrible had come between them, and that was exactly how it happened. this tragedy occurred within five days of the two meeting, they experienced love at first sight, got married and quickly were dead. free will became a part of this when juliet decided to take friar laurence’s advise in inhaling a potion that will make people assume she is died but will awake in 42 hours prier to when she took it. when romeo had heard the news that juliet was dead, he assumed it was true, and responded with the line; “well juliet, i will lay with thee tonight”. to me this line indicated how he feels for juliet by dying in her will. the fact that free will didn’t take control of the story; it left fate to be the murder of the lovers. fate first kicked in when their eyes met at the capulet party. when romeo and juliet spoke, their words had powerful contentment; they had such a strong feeling for one another that they could lay in each other’s arms forever. their happiness didn’t last long; there were many reasons for this, for example; the marriage lord capulet arranged between paris and juliet. i believe that the plot of the play thus far leads the audience to believe that the deaths were a result of fate. the last act will determine once and for all if it is fate or free will. romeo again challenges fate.

explanation: