English
English, 10.04.2020 15:23, pingkeara

Write a short essay (200–400 words) comparing the two versions of the poem, considering the following questions:

How does the meter of the poem change, if at all, when it is presented in song form?
Does the original poem have a meter that lends itself well to song lyrics?
How, if at all, is the poem changed or presented differently as a song?
Why might the artist have made changes to the poem?
Does the poem take on a different meaning in song form than in poetic form?
Structure your essay into an introduction, body, and conclusion. Make sure your essay focuses on a main idea, includes precise language to clarify ideas, and is written in a formal style. Use textual evidence, including scansion, to support your ideas.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 22.06.2019 04:30, tgamble1
In the song mallam sile sings in lines 113 through 130 the knife probably represents
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 08:00, harleyandpope90
What are the similarities of physical and chemical change ?
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 09:30, evanwall91
These two sentences have one difference: one has a comma. think about what each sentence means. 1. let's eat, grandma. 2. let's eat grandma. what does the first sentence mean? what does the second sentence mean?
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 11:40, andreagrimaldo4
In which part of this excerpt from the gettysburg address does president abraham lincoln argue that the outcome of the war will depend on the determination and loyalty of northern citizens? four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. we are met on a great battle-field of that war. we have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. it is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. but, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can not hallow— this ground. the brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. the world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. it is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. it is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us— that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under god, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Write a short essay (200–400 words) comparing the two versions of the poem, considering the followin...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 22.07.2019 20:30