The Marquis Evremonde, represented the evil in society. Charles Darnay, on the other hand, represented a virtuous force as compared to his predecessor. What was Dickens purpose in creating this contradiction between predecessor and descendant?

Explanation:

I believe the author wanted to portray a comparison of "the old way of thinking" and "the new way of thinking. Sir Marquis represented the arrogance that aristocrats had towards poor people, how they look down on them, and how they wanted to mantain the poor poor and the wealthy wealthy. While Sir Charles represented a younger generation with a different view of the word. Still being an aristocrat, Charles wanted to help people have better opportunities in life. But mostly, he resented the upper class (like his uncle sir marquis) on how they extorted the lower class. This contradiction between predecessor and descendant demonstrated that no matter what your linage is, each person has their own thoughts about life. He wanted to portray that new generations can help build a better society.

i took this test im trying to remember i think it is the first one im super sorry if i remembered wrong!

answer: buck is a dog living a charmed life on the estate of judge miller, during the time of the klondike gold rush in 1897. he is the king of all the animals on the estate and as such enjoys special privileges, such as the run of the estate and the admirable position of being the judge's favorite dog.

this all ends the day he accompanies manuel on a walk through the orchard to a flag station, where manuel sells him to a stranger. manuel sells buck, because he has gambling debts he needs to pay and a family to support.

this one act changes buck's life irrevocably. it is the catalyst for the rest of the story about buck and his transformation from domestic pet to wild animal.

explanation: read thoughroly ! and u will find your answer and the mean time i will be keeping my eye on you !