Rudyard Kipling wrote an 1888 story, set in British colonial India, about two trouble-makers who travel to Afghanistan and there encounter the legacy of Alexander the Great. What was this novella (and the 1975 movie of the story) titled

The Man Who Would Be King and the movie with the same name directed by John Huston.

Explanation:

Rudyard Kipling's "The Man Who Would Be King" was a novel that revolves around the characters of adventurers Daniel Dravot and Peachey Carnehan. They had initially came to India and then moved further to Afghanistan town of Kafiristan. They succeeded to be deemed kings and even worshiped as gods due to their different looks and possession of the Martini- Henry rifles.

They were deemed equal to Alexander the Great but then their facade collapsed when Dravot decided to marry a local Kafir and led to the discovery of their 'human' condition. Through the act of bleeding, Daniel showed the locals that he is indeed human just like them and no different. This led to their downfall. The 1888 story was made into a movie with the same title by director John Huston in 1975, starring Sean Connery as Daniel Dravot and Michael Caine as Peachey Carnehan.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

the answer would be b.