What is the speaker’s viewpoint? What is his claim?

Patrick Henry’s "Give Me Liberty, or Give Me Death!" speech (1775) page 457

1. Patrick Henry’s "Give Me Liberty, or Give Me Death!"  viewpoint in the speech of (1775) at Second Virginia Convention,  was a phrase, idiomatically expressed to portray in grievances of  the displeasure of man inhumanity to man. It was a set-phrase indicating enormous displeasure at any over-authoritarian policy or law over some perceived vulnerable people.

2. Patrick Henry's claim on Give Me Liberty speech  on the Second Virginia Convention was to implore his countrymen to declare war against the British colonists in their colonies.

Explanation:

1.  Patrick Henry urged fellow Virginians to support the Revolutionary War, saying “give me liberty or give me death!” that encouraged Virginia legislators to provide troops to the Revolutionary War effort, which eventually helped to create the Continental Army in less than three months after the declaration.

2. Patrick Henry's claim on Give Me Liberty speech  on the Second Virginia Convention on March 23, 1775, at St. John's Church in Richmond, Virginia was to implore his countrymen to declare war against the British. Henry points to the presence of British soldiers in the colonies, asserting that they're not there for the protection of the colonists. They're there to enforce British colonial rule.

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.

the author is showing that it is the insatisfaction of basic needs that brings about the protests such as the strikes.if workers do not earn enough to buy food and feed their families and themselves in order to continue working, what is the use of working? besides, another message from the author is that of the owners of factories should be worried about ensuring their furure by having a second and third generation of workers in their industries.if they do not hear the workers demands, they will not have any more workers to make their pockets full.