1Mr. McDonaldson sprints to the head trainer. “Why isn’t that horse lining up for the next race? Nick, do you think I can afford to keep and feed and care for a horse if she isn’t racing?”

2Nick shook his head slowly. “Your horse has a hurt leg. Did you see her slow down during the last race? I think she pulled something.”

3 “Look, I paid good money for her three years ago and I need her to keep racing!”

4 “But sir,” pleaded Nick, “let’s please not race her injured. She could be hurt worse if she runs with a bum leg.”

5 “Do I look like I’m kidding? Massage it and wrap it in one of those magical bandages. I also pay good money to have you around as well, and don’t you forget it!”

6In a burning rage, Mr. McDonaldson storms off to the enormous holding stable. He spies his prize horse a few stalls away and stands in front of her. His heart quickly melts at the sight of her. He remembers riding her after he first bought her from a fellow rancher. Her speed, her grace, and her gentleness made Mr. McDonaldson treat her differently from his other horses. Grace, a name never better fit a horse.

7Grace leans her head down and nuzzles Mr. McDonaldson’s neck. He gently runs his hands along her mane and then slowly walks away.

8After a few minutes, Mr. McDonaldson finally sees Nick. “I am truly sorry, Nick. I shouldn’t have yelled at you. You were doing your job well. Let Grace rest for the remainder of the day.” Mr. McDonaldson shakes Nick’s hand, and then walks to the stands to witness the next race.
1)
How does the holding stable scene change the plot of the story?
A) Mr. McDonaldson changed his mind about racing Grace.
B) All of the horses in the stable made finding Grace very difficult.
C) Grace was able to convince Mr. McDonaldson to put her back in the race.
D) Nick persuaded Mr. McDonaldson that racing an injured horse was not wise.

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.

answer: while there are loads of great interviewing techniques and questions, i feel it’s important to balance time and effectiveness when determining whether a candidate and employer relationship will be strong long-term.

explanation: