English
English, 01.03.2020 05:36, ecletcicbeauty5793

14. five steps to listening effectively

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 19:00, greend0719
It was a bitter cold saturday morning ,the young track star dressed for his daily five mile run
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 21:20, BluSeaa
Read the sentences below and complete the instruction that follows. the coach, who has ten years' experience, has agreed to lead our team. the coach who has ten years' experience has agreed to lead our team. select the answer that explains the difference between the two sentences, as well as the purpose each clause serves for the benefit of the reader. a.) the first sentence contains a noun clause that functions as a predicate nominative; therefore, it renames the subject of the sentence for the reader. the second sentence contains an essential adjective clause that modifies the noun "coach"; therefore, it clarifies for the reader which coach is being discussed. b.) the first sentence contains a nonessential adjective clause that modifies the noun "coach"; therefore, it provides the reader with interesting details about the subject of the sentence. the second sentence contains an essential adjective clause that modifies the noun "coach"; therefore, it clarifies for the reader which coach is being discussed. c.) the first sentence contains a nonessential adjective clause that modifies the noun "coach"; therefore, it provides the reader with interesting details about the subject of the sentence. the second sentence contains a noun clause that functions as a predicate nominative; therefore, it renames the subject of the sentence for the reader. d.) the first sentence contains an adverb clause that modifies the verb "agreed"; therefore, it provides the reader with the answer to the question "when." the second sentence contains an essential adjective clause that modifies the noun "coach"; therefore, it clarifies for the reader which coach is being discussed.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 09:00, zahriaarana
In a debate focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, the following argument is made. which type of special appeal does it demonstrate? “my opponent is correct—distracted driving is very dangerous. many activities—texting, talking on the phone, looking at maps, eating breakfast—all of these contribute to accidents. yes, we have statistics to support that. however, my opponent is totally ignoring the role that improper and inconsistent maintenance of your vehicle can also have in causing accidents! ” a. false analogy b. red herring c. bandwagon d. fallacy of argument from ignorance
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 21:00, artbydi
Best way to define the term rhetoric
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
14. five steps to listening effectively...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 01.08.2019 09:40
Konu
Mathematics, 01.08.2019 09:40
Konu
Advanced Placement (AP), 01.08.2019 09:40