Read the following paragraph from the article.

Sorkin wrote that he felt that Lee's novel had not shown Calpurnia or Robinson's reactions to the racial injustice around them: "Tom begs for his life, and Cal bakes crackling bread. It's the kind of thing that would have gone unnoticed in 1960, but in 2018, using black characters only as atmosphere is as noticeable as it is wrong. Also, in this instance, a wasted opportunity."

Which of the following conclusions can be drawn from the paragraph above?

A
Sorkin held much contempt for the way Lee's novel portrayed Calpurnia and Tom Robinson.
B
Sorkin viewed the rewriting of the Tom and Calpurnia characters as an opportunity to right a wrong.
C
Sorkin believes that the characters Calpurnia and Tom Robinson went unnoticed in Lee's novel.
D
Sorkin hopes that rewriting the Tom and Calpurnia characters will bring about more racial justice.

that is literally a whole assignment and i'm not sure anyone in their right mind or even wrong mind is going to do an entire assignment for someone just for 100 points on a website. sorry to tell you like

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest

the mending wall was written by robert frost