Create ONE original post that:

Explains how a fictional story could transform or change history.
Discusses the accuracy of historical fiction, explaining whether you believe it is misleading.
Answers the question: Is the author responsible for being accurate, or is it the reader's responsibility to understand it is a work of fiction?

some of my favorite books are historical fiction but i must agree that they can be misleading.

Explanation:

they can be misleading if you do not know the history which is why most will say they are historical fiction and where you find them should tell you it is a fiction, but it is more up to the reader to understand the book because thats what makes fiction books fun you get to interpret the story yourself.

   hope i helped

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.

i think the literacy device is "it's frozen head"