Write an essay answering the question: is using literal or figurative language a more effective way to communicate? Provide examples from poems you have studied and from your own research to justify your claim.

Figurative language or Non-literal language is the language utilized by scholarly craftsmen in their work. It is not quite the same as exacting language in that its significance is more profound and isn't seen effectively. Moreover, it has the ability to impart superior to strict language.  

It is significant for readers to comprehend the utilization of allegorical language in abstract works for them to value the functions admirably. Non-literal language includes the utilization of sayings, allegories, comparisons and idiom among others.

Explanation:

The most ideal approach to convey, I for one figure it would be both in light of the fact that occasionally utilizing strict language can cause an individual to feel as though your feelings are disengaged. We each have a section to occur in our locale and the world. Which implies we should figure out how to talk and communicate our feelings. Everybody regardless of size, race, or religion will learn one day to communicate.  

The utilization of exacting language can be incredible now and then, yet would you address a companion that way? I realize I wouldn't. It would mean no jokes and no good times. This is the reason I think it is incredible that every one of us have our own particular manner of talking. Also, we need along these lines since we are ourselves regardless of the amount you drill into our heads and state "Were no different" we are not I guarantee you this. We are the cutting edge the one that will support this world and change our language.  

So when we combine the two we get our language today. We don't live in the eighteenth century today our language is consistently transforming we have to act like it regardless of how old. In the event that you look in a paper even they have grasped utilizing both online articles as well. Check out you we consolidate the two all over the place however relatively few individuals will need to see it, since they are the individuals before. So how would we fix this? We don't we acknowledge what our identity is, the manner by which we talk and compose and proceed onward. Presently yes this appears to be odd originating from somebody of my age, presently yes I'm no Albert Einstein yet I think I hear what I'm saying.  

At times it tends to be extraordinary to utilize strict language like at a prospective employee meet-up. You wouldn't have any desire to go to one making quips and talking in similitudes. Which implies it simply is about the circumstance we are in. At a gathering or spending time with companions its incredible to utilize non-literal language. Very few individuals will concur with this particularly more established individuals who were instructed how to talk 50 years back, yet that doesn't mean we need to grasp it. We are ever changing so I feel that we need space to develop, as I've said before we can't be hauled into the past, in the event that you do our age will deteriorate.  

I realize this isn't the manner by which we are educated to talk in grade school or anyplace else, yet the manner in which we do things are evolving. We can't be stuck in the past any longer on the off chance that we need to do extraordinary things. We are the age that will change the world so please let us act like it, since we can't be hauled into the past. We are extraordinary in our own specific manner everybody is trained this however they don't trust it, yet on the off chance that you take a gander at the manner in which this is composed against all the others you can see one thing distinctive we each discussion unique. Which implies we are unique, so kindly don't treat us the equivalent.  

For Example

Literal Descriptions

 Grass looks green.

 The flower smells sweet.

Figurative Descriptions

 The grass looks like

spiky green hair.

 The flower has the

sweetest smelling petals

in the world.

animal farm, written by george orwell, is a representation of russia after the revolution that led stalin to take over power.

in this excerpt, the central idea seems to be that the animals (a representation of society), when they believe to be working for a greater good and equality, are obedient and productive. they were convinced that, after expelling the owner (jones) from the farm, they would live in harmony and be fairly treated.

as we know, the pigs become the leaders and grow more selfish and dictatorial with time. in the end, they look and act in a way so similar to humans that it is impossible to tell the difference. the ideals of equality are shattered, and the farm turns out to be worse than it was before. the animals are manipulated with false propaganda and forced to work in order to enrich the pigs.

c is a symbol. when bernice gets her hair cut, it is the authors way of showing the affects and demands of pier pressure and the over-all attitudes of people at the time.