While george jacobs is mentioned in the play , his trial is not shown . how does his trial affect your interpretation of the film? what does it show about the character /courts

The lack of trial by the court implied that the court had little evidence regarding the issue.

Read related link on:

link

The inclusion of scenes regarding the actual trial of George Jacobs adds to the mood of the film. It makes it seem the courts are acting on hearsay with little concrete evidence.

Explanation:

In the movie version of The Crucible, George Jacobs appears in court and is hanged for witchcraft because of accusations from Ruth Putnam. This adds to the feeling that the courts are being harsh on the characters accused of witchcraft and that there is a dangerous sentiment in the town where simple accusations and rumors or suspicions can result in the death of community members. It created a sense of having to accuse someone else in order not to be accused of witchcraft yourself, and that the entire town was descending into paranoia and darkness.

we need the passage first

cassius, casca, and their allies plant false documents to manipulate brutus to join their cause to remove caesar. after doing so, they visit brutus at night in his home to persuade him of their views. there they plan caesar's death. brutus is troubled but refuses to confide in his devoted wife, portia. on 15 march, caesar's wife, calpurnia, urges him not to go to the senate. she has had visionary dreams and fears the portents of the overnight storms.