How would a utopia change if the citizens were under constant surveillance?

It would no longer be a utopia. A surveillance state directly removes the rights of its citizens to privacy. Without that basic right, it could not be considered a utopia. If a country were to do that, then it is implied that they are going to arrest any citizen they see "stepping out of line," whether that be breaking the law, speaking out against the nation, etc. The constant surveillance of the citizens, if they knew about it, would make them either break laws to find a way around it, or they would become constantly paranoid and suspicious of everyone and thing around them.

answer: b. grete might have remained as shy and immature as she was at the beginning of the story.

one of the most interesting characteristics of gregor's metamorphosis is that, although he is the only character who has physically changed, it is this same change which triggered a transformation in the rest of his family.

by taking care of gregor, grete has become stronger and more confident. she has found a life outside of the house, and has become more independent and self-sufficient. the novel implies that the trigger for the change is gregor's own transformation, and that without it, grete was likely to remain as shy and immature as she was at the beginning of the book.

explanation: