Question is in the picture attached.

To make a conclusion whether Helen Keller would or would not have learned without Anne Sullivan would be an appeal to ignorance fallacy.

Explanation:

There is no doubt about Anne Sullivan’s role in Helen Keller’s learning, but saying she would not have learned had Sullivan not come to teach her would be a hasty conclusion. There was every chance that if not Sullivan, someone else, may be after a year or more, had come to teach Helen Keller. And who knows she might have learned even more and faster without Sullivan. Reaching this or its opposite conclusion would be a fallacy of appeal to ignorance.

Appeal to ignorance is a fallacy by which we consider a proposition to be true because it has not been proved false, or a proposition to be false because it has not been proved true.

in which scenario might one be asked to take minute meetings?

answer: b. a student attending an orientation

hi there!

sorry i was debating over answering this question or not, but i do believe it is a sin to be gay. in the beginning, god created man and he created women to be a for man. there are many "political" views on this topic but i believe the bible is right. in the kjv bible, leviticus 18: 22, god talks about how it it is an abomination for women to be with women and man to be with man. god knows that everybody is a sinner, and he gives everyone a chance to repent. i'm not forcing god's word on anybody, but i do believe it is a sin. no matter the sin, as long as you repent, god is willing to forgive, you just have to accept him as your lord and savior.