English
English, 29.12.2019 15:31, mat1413

Can anyone out with this detail one way that you could act that would not be acting legally or ethically.
i can violate the child protection law and respond to violence to not main legality. i will not consider the mental or physical illness of the children and would put them in a situation which can aggravate their condition to not main ethicality. also, if i am not involved with any institution, it may include an act which can leave a mark on their psychological health. for example, as can be fiund out from the market research, nestle had been involved in a number of misledadimg and mislguiding marketing adavertisements or acts and has been hugely criticized for the same. from manipulating with the milk solution to the manipulation of the minds of gthe children. nestle, had been involved in all sorts of behaviour, which are both illegal and unethical. i don't wont this one i try to think some else

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 20:00, ashiteru123
What do you think inspires people to come up with great inventions? explain in 4 sentences
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 21:30, wldfire61821
Which best identifies the figurative language used in this passage? cannon to right of them, cannon to left of them, cannon in front of them volley’d and thunder’d; storm’d at with shot and shell, boldly they rode and well, into the jaws of death, into the mouth of hell rode the six hundred.
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 22:00, WATBOI01
Read the passage from a vindication of the rights of woman. that the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. does wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 09:00, matthewmalte7329
According to the essay how do meat eaters feel about vegans
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Can anyone out with this detail one way that you could act that would not be acting legally or ethi...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 28.08.2020 21:01
Konu
Arts, 28.08.2020 21:01