Read the excerpt from a speech petitioning people to adopt animals in need.

i am here today to persuade you to see the benefit of adopting your next pet from the animal shelter instead of purchasing it from a pet store. it is crucial to see the value in adopting animals and hopefully putting pet stores out of business. the health and well-being of our animal friends is what is at stake here. many people think it would be fun to get a cute designer animal from a boutique pet shop, but once we all know the truth behind their practices, we will be lining up at the shelter to fall in love with an animal in need. your new dog may not be a purebred dog with official papers and a customized small size, but you will know that your animal is healthy and eternally grateful that you provided him with a warm home.

which ideas from the excerpt would be most appropriate to include in a summary? select two options.

many people want a designer dog from a boutique.
animals bred through pet shops suffer health problems.
people need to adopt animals instead of going to pet shops.
many people have a warm home and like animals.
more people need to decide to have pets in their homes.

Second option: Animals bred through pet shops suffer health problems.

Third Option: People need to adopt animals instead of going to pet shops.

Explanation:

These two ideas best summarize the ideas presented in the excerpt. Speaker's main purpose is to persuade the audience not to buy animals from pet store instead adopt them from animal shelter, he (speaker) needs to give audience a reason why they should not buy from pet stores. This reason is provided in the second option i.e these animals suffer health problems. The third option is the conclusion and purpose of the speech. So this point too is required for summarizing the speech.

First and fourth options, although relevant, are less important when considering the purpose of the speech.

Fifth option is neither part of the speech, not speaker's purpose.

amy tan

explanation:

the legal limit for the drivers who can drive after consuming any amount of alcohol is 21 years.

explanation:

on november 1, 1996, a "zero tolerance law" was put into effect in the new york state.

according to this zero tolerance law, for people under the age of 21 years, it was illegal to purchase and possess alcohol or to drive after consuming any amount of it.

also, the alcohol involvement rate for the drivers under the age of 21 was roughly twice that of elderly drivers.