Read the excerpt from act 3 of a doll’s house. krogstad [with a searching look at her]. is that what it all means? —that you want to save your friend at any cost? tell me frankly. is that it? mrs. linde: nils, a woman who has once sold herself for another's sake, doesn't do it a second time. krogstad: i will ask for my letter back. mrs. linde: no, no. krogstad: yes, of course i will. i will wait here until helmer comes; i will tell him he must give me my letter back—that it only concerns my dismissal—that he is not to read it— mrs. linde: no, nils, you must not recall your letter. krogstad: but, tell me, wasn't it for that very purpose that you asked me to meet you here? mrs. linde: in my first moment of fright, it was. but twenty-four hours have elapsed since then, and in that time i have witnessed incredible things in this house. helmer must know all about it. this unhappy secret must be disclosed; they must have a complete understanding between them, which is impossible with all this concealment and falsehood going on. krogstad: very well, if you will take the responsibility. but there is one thing i can do in any case, and i shall do it at once. which evidence from the text best supports the theme that it is better if the truth comes out? “you want to save your friend at any cost? ” “a woman who has once sold herself for another's sake, doesn't do it a second time.” “this unhappy secret must be disclosed; they must have a complete understanding.” “very well, if you will take the responsibility.”