How is this claim arguable?

i much prefer reading on a tablet or a computer than reading from a book.

explain also why it's arguable .

if it is a claim thats not arguable then will u make it arguable for me? alter it enough to make it arguable for me .

Yes your claim is arguable.

Explanation:

Here are some reasons as to why you would prefer reading on a tablet or computer rather than reading from a book.

I much prefer reading on a tablet or computer than reading a book because seeing the book on a screen helps me to focus better. The bright lights help me to pay attention, and a tablet or computer is something I am more familiar with. My brain associates computers and tablets with happiness, because I am usually doing something fun while on the device. This will help me to find reading more fun.

Here is the answer to your initial question.

My claim is arguable because I have examples and reasoning to support it. For example, my brain associates tablets and computer with fun and happiness. Usually, when I am on on of those devices, I am doing something fun that I enjoy. My brain will then associate reading with fun things because I am on a device my brain recognizes as fun.

the word that best matches the meaning of the expression "went to the big ocean" is died.

the goldfish died, which is why the father looks at the children mournfully. the "big ocean" is the father's way of saying fish heaven. he could have just said that the goldfish died, but this way, the children imagine the fish in a bigger, better place instead of just picturing a dead fish.

explanation: