Which of the following are credible information sources for a research paper?

blogsmagazinesacademic journalsresearch papers by expertscollege studentspeers who maintain excellent grades

Academic Journals, Research papers from experts.

Explanation:

1. Blogs

Blogs are generally NOT reliable sources as they tend to be personal statements without any real academic background. You can read them for perspective on an issue, but ensure to get your facts from other sources!

2. Academic Journals

Are GREAT sources! The articles in journals tend to be peer-reviewed, meaning they undergo a rigorous process of editing and checking by experts - ensuring the research is not biased and the facts are trustworthy! This is likely the most reliable source in your list.

3. Research Papers by EXPERTS

Also awesome sources. The credentials of the author are often a good indicator of the reliability (ie. if a PhD wrote the paper). They may not have always been peer-reviewed, but if the credentials line up or they are published from a trustworthy source these can be an excellent source of information.

4. Students/Peers

Are NOT experts in the field! Do not cite their work. They may have great grades in the course, but are not a direct source of information.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

yeah, i think its a good thing what do you think?