Read the excerpt from “us supreme court: ingraham v. wright.”

"elimination or curtailment of corporal punishment would be welcomed by many as a societal advance. but when such a policy choice may result from this court’s determination of an asserted right to due process, rather than from the normal processes of community debate and legislative action, the societal costs cannot be dismissed as insubstantial."

which option best explains how this information fits into the chain of legal reasoning?

us supreme court: ingraham v. wright

a.) it is part of the issue in the case, because it examines whether the originating incident of corporal punishment was actually unlawful and deserving of due process.

b.) it is part of the rule of the case, because it states and cites the law of the due process clause in the fourteenth amendment.

c.)it is part of the conclusion in the case, because it applies a judgment and due process to the originating incident of corporal punishment of students or minors.

d.)it is part of the analysis in the case, because it considers whether local regulations could be limited if the court finds that students’ rights were violated.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

shu9sfuidayfsdpisyvruo i wanr them nnuegt

explanation:

in my opinion, anyone should be allowed to marry as long as it's not going against any laws. though i kind of contradict myself because i know that in some states and countries, gay marriage isn't legal yet- hopefully you get my point.

what’s the topic your looking for