Which comparison of the two excerpts is most accurate? excerpt 1 is objective and verifiable, while excerpt 2 is subjective and opinionated. excerpt 1 is subjective and opinionated, while excerpt 2 is objective and verifiable. both excerpts are subjective, containing emotional language that shares the writers' opinions. both excerpts are objective, stating the facts in plain language without expressing any opinions.

the correct answer is option d. none of these. it is noted that options a, b, and c share the same content.

despite the valid answer provided at the last sentence of each of the options, a question/answer format shouldn't include humourous themed responses such as "you bet your thermal pj's we do." - unless of course, the answer is carried out in an informal environment. this could be replaced with a simple "yes" or "it is necessary".

the question should be re-phrased to a more appropiate syntaxis. instead of "do we need the greenhouse effect? ", it should be written as "is the greenhouse effect necessary? " in order to give it a general scope, instead of limiting the answer to the needs of "we" the humans.

"valley of salt tears" and "dark, deep and foggy" are two images used to establish a mood of uncertainty and regret. this imagery is made up of sensory appeals to brings up   theological concerns of sin and retribution.

they conjure up the human   uncertainty about the divine and its relationship to the world.