Using your knowledge of this side of paradise, write an argumentative essay on whether or not you agree that the novel should be considered part of the “quest” genre. consider the conversation between amory and monsignor darcy on personality versus personage in book 1, chapter 3. defend your position/claim with at least three pieces of evidence considering elements of the quest genre and whether the novel fits within them. use direct quotes and examples from the text to support your evidence. be sure to include a discussion and refutation of the counterclaim. your essay should be at least 500 words in length, with a clear introduction and meaningful conclusion. revise and edit for grammar and mechanics before submitting. consider organization, ideas, voice, sentence fluency, conventions, and word choice. follow mla format for in-text citations and include a works-cited page.

I remember reading this selection in British lit, but i cant remember what i wrote for the essay.

Explanation:

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

for me, i'd go with (c) satisfied or (b) overjoyed because if you read it a couple of times, it makes since that it is c or b. it can't b (a) angry because booker was never angry about anything. at the end of the paragraph, booker states, "i think there are not many men in our country who have had the privilege of naming themselves in the way that i " i think that sentence kind of gives away the also, some words in the paragraph can also you like for example, "indulged," "calmly," "perplexity," "privilege," and defining words that you don't know, can you understand more of that paragraph and it can also increase your comprehension. : )

i'm really rally sorry if i'm incorrect, but if i'm hope this ! : )