True grit is a type of character quality. do you see any code of ethics that the characters seem to adhere to? if so what ? look at the protagonist and the antagonist. how would the story be different if they had a different code of ethics? answer the discussion at least three paragraphs

the story could be told diffrently though diffrent characters instead of just one.What dose mattie want?  She wants to gain revenge for her father’s death by seeing to it Tom Chaney gets killed.

Explanation:

The story is told through her perspective

* It is the death of her father and her desire for revenge that initiates the story and provides the Plotline’s spine

* The trek to find Tom Chaney, her father’s murderer, takes her out of her Ordinary World (home life) and into the New World of Adventure (the chase), befitting The Hero’s Journey

* Mattie is the character who goes through the most significant metamorphosis

Hope this helps!

the servant does not kill the child oedipus as he was ordered to do because "he pitied the child" based on the oedipus rex story. the servant was ordered to kill the child because of the prophecy that predicted king laius' death. the king already had attempted to hurt oedipus by piercing oedipus's ankle. however, the servant did not finish the job and he rather saved the baby oedipus.

explanation:

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."