Ultimately, which of these two pieces of writing do you find more effective in communicating the narrator thoughts to the audience? explain why you prefer one work over the other

  match the example to the term.   1. formal standard english: by the power vested in me as a minister of the gospel, i now pronounce you man and wife. what god has joined together, let not man put asunder.2. colloquial english:   congratulations, jim and sarah. we're very happy for you. you for inviting us3. technical text: to register online at smith's bridal, complete the form below and press "enter." (directions, instructions or explanation) 4. regional dialect y'all make a fine couple! i reckon you'll be happy. 5. informational text: the photographer said he would photoshop in a better picture of the uncooperative flower girl.6. jargon: the aforementioned parties, in entering into said agreement, hereby mutually swear that they have, to the best of their abilities, provided a truthful representation of their intent . .   (legal jargon)7. informal standard english: way to go, guys! you'll do great! (no conjunctions used)8. slang: hey, just chill out. (used by a particular profession or group)9. literary text: entreat me not to leave thee or to refrain from following after thee. for whither thou goest i will go (bible)

You they argue about you beacause youre so noisy tsk tsk tsk

Im assuming the underlined word is indefatigable. the root word here is fatigue, which basically means exhaustion, so since the prefix is "in"- meaning anti or un- then that means you're  inexhaustible.  -hope this

Side note: did you ever get the answer it was re-assigned to me and i am still not sure.