Which statement explains the reasoning and evidence
used to support the claim that a principality created by
the people is easier to rule?
the argument uses deductive reasoning and
logical evidence in the form of a historical example
to support the claim.
the argument relies on logical evidence in the form
of a historical example to draw a general conclusion
that supports the claim.
the argument uses both deductive and inductive
reasoning that relies on anecdotal evidence to
support the claim.
the argument presents empirical evidence in the
form of statistics to form deductive reasoning and support the claim.

The argument uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.

Explanation:

The claim that a principality created by the people is easier to govern is a conclusion of deductive thinking, where the author has used evidence to substantiate that claim. These evidences must have been taken from historical facts, which prove that the conclusion is correct. In other words, we can say that to generate this claim, the author used an argument that uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.

yes its like krisnis like in the air force .

i will have to go with 1.

hope this !