Can someone me according to international law of europe in the late 18th century, there were only three ways that britain could take possession of another country. what were they?

a) if the country was uninhabited, britain could claim and settle that country. in this case, it could claim ownership of the land.

b) if the country was already inhabited, britain could ask for permission from the indigenous people to use some of their land. in this case, britain could purchase land for its own use but could not steal the land of the indigenous people.

c) if the country was already inhabited, they could ignore the indigenous people on the land so long as they did not challenge their settlement.

d) if the country was inhabited, britain could take over the country by invasion and conquest; in other words, defeat that country in war. however, even after winning a war, britain would have to respect the rights of indigenous people.

e) if the country was already inhabited, they could ask the indigenous people on the land for permission to use some of their land. if the response was no, they then could use force to settle the land.

Messalla frowns at the wide circular cover, for a moment returning to his own fussy world.

What reasons does the speaker provide to support his viewpoint or claim in what to the slave is the fourth of july i read to speech and but i just don't fully understand the question i just want to make sure i get it right so to explain that the question is asking me to do. and you!

Hurry i am on the semester test which theme is evident in this excerpt from robert frost's "mending wall"? but at spring mending-time we find them there. i let my neighbor know beyond the hill; and on a day we meet to walk the line and set the wall between us once again. we keep the wall between us as we go. to each the boulders that have fallen to each. and some are loaves and some so nearly balls we have to use a spell to make them balance: "stay where you are until our backs are turned! " we wear our fingers rough with handling them. oh, just another kind of out-door game, one on a side. it comes to little more: there where it is we do not need the wall: he is all pine and i am apple orchard. my apple trees will never get across and eat the cones under his pines, i tell him. he only says, “good fences make good neighbors." spring is the mischief in me, and i wonder if i could put a notion in his head: "why do they make good neighbors? isn't it where there are cows? but here there are no cows. before i built a wall i'd ask to know what i was walling in or walling out, and to whom i was like to give offence. . " a. the human desire for material gain b. the influence of financial constraints c. the positive effects of friendship d. the uncertain nature of human relations e. the futility of human yearning