Read the excerpt from last lecture. there are 50 students drawn from all the different departments of the university. there are randomly chosen teams, four people per team, and they change every project. a project only lasts two weeks, so you do something, you make something, you show something, then i shuffle the teams, you get three new playmates and you do it again. . the first assignment, i gave it to them, they came back in two weeks and they just blew me away. i mean the work was so beyond, literally, my imagination, because i had copied the process from imagineering’s vr lab, but i had no idea what they could or couldn’t do with it as undergraduates, and their tools were weaker, and they came back on the first assignment, and they did something that was so spectacular that i literally didn’t, ten years as a professor and i had no idea what to do next. so i called up my mentor, and i called up andy van dam.
what is the organizational structure of this section of the speech? chronological ordering compare and contrast cause and effect problem and resolution

1. the details that would clarify the authors purpose for writing would be after the "haley collected used soccer jersey and sent them to guatemalan children." part, he would say, "and you can also donate today to save ". so far in the text, you can see no such thing. if, near the end the author persuades you to donate to guatemalans, then you know that the author's reason to write is to persuade you.

2. what details would make the text more engaging is to see the guatemalan children's reaction to getting free jerseys.

3. the details that convey the author's attitude would be an opinion by the author, for example, if he said, "haley was a very nice girl " or, you can find the attitude by finding parts of haley's personality that he highlights. you can strengthen your tones by using more descriptive words, and simplify long sentences as much as you can.

you're welcome ; p

idk srry

explanation:

from the political point of view it could be said that the candidate   is an effective speaker because she takes a strong position on the issue. it is an open discussion but probably she is making a presentation and can choose which subjects she wants to address. she is very likely to attain her aim which is to convince voters to accept her proposal.

i believe the answer is inference