English
English, 09.09.2019 18:30, johnsnow69

Original source material
student version
when instructors are creating discussion board activities for online courses, at least two questions must be answered. first, what is the objective of the discussions? different objectives might be to create a "social presence" among students so that they do not feel isolated, to ask questions regarding assignments or topics, or to determine if students understand a topic by having them analyze and evaluate contextual situations. based on the response to this question, different rules might be implemented to focus on the quality of the interaction more so than the quantity. the second question is, how important is online discussions in comparison to the other activities that students will perform? this question alludes to the amount of participation that instructors expect from students in online discussions along with the other required activities for the course. if a small percentage of student effort is designated for class participation, our results show that it can affect the quality and quantity of interactions.
references:
moore, j. l., & marra, r. m. (2005) a comparative analysis of online discussion participation protocols. journal of research on technology in education, 38(2), 191-212.
according to moore and marra's (2005) case study, which observed two online courses, students in the first course implemented a constructive argumentation approach while students in second course had less structure for their postings. as they stated, when instructors create online discussion board activities, they must answer at least two questions. these questions are: "what is the objective of the discussions? " and "how important are online discussions in comparison to the other activities that students will perform? " according to their findings, the discussion activities that were designed based on the answers to these questions can influence the quality and quantity of interactions (moore & marra, 2005).
references:
moore, j. l., & marra, r. m. (2005) a comparative analysis of online discussion participation protocols. journal of research on technology in education, 38(2), 191-212.
which of the following is true for the student version above?
word-for-word plagiarism
paraphrasing plagiarism
this is not plagiarism

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 22.06.2019 01:20, thedoragreen
Write an explanation for how to perform some kind of physical activity, such as riding a bike or playing a sport. the explanation should be geared toward someone who has never performed the activity. be sure to explain the steps in the process clearly, organize your ideas appropriately, use text features
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 02:00, memester74
What is the best statement about carl sandburg poetry?
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 04:50, nghtcll
Match the term to the correct example. 1. allusion juliet: else would i tear the cave where echo lies, / and make her airy tongue more hoarse than 2. imagery chorus: that fair for which love groan’d for and would die, / with tender juliet match’d, is now not fair. 3. personification friar laurence: therefore love moderately; long love doth so; / too swift arrives as tardy as too slow. 4. foreshadowing romeo: the brightness of her cheek would shame those stars / as daylight doth a lamp.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 08:00, bobduncan1086
Analysis that compares and contrasts the way two myths show one important feature of their culture
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Original source material
student version
when instructors are creating discussion boar...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 30.12.2021 02:50