What does wiesel use here to develop his claim?
of course, indifference can be tempting—more than that, seductive. it is so much
easier to look away from victims. it is so much easier to avoid such rude
interruptions to our work, our dreams, our hopes. it is, after all, awkward,
troublesome, to be involved in another person's pain and despair. yet, for the
person who is indifferent, his or her neighbor are of no consequence. and,
therefore, their lives are meaningless. their hidden or even visible anguish is of no
interest. indifference reduces the other to an abstraction.
last question for pre-test

idk vro dont ask me lol

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."