What is the difference between direct and indirect characterization? provide an example of each from “the day i got lost.”
"the day i got lost"

oke, look i will give you another exaple ok? my teacher explain it like this, so sorry if its not right.

Explanation:

direct is : u have a 'botlle' on the table, and u want to like overturn it. u throw a book into the botlle and it overturn it indirect with something else between...

ik its weird but right.

indirect is: u grab the botlle and overturn it your felf

i hope it helps :)

Answer and Explanation:

Direct characterization occurs when the narrator directly says what a character is like.

For example: Professor Shlemiel calls himself "forgetful" and says he's always blundering and losing things.

Indirect characterization is when the narrator shows indirectly some characteristics about someone in the story. It may be through the character's actions, opinions, or things other characters say.

For example: Professor Shlemiel's wife, long familiar with his behavior, warns him, "Now, don't forget your address."

which of the following was specifically permitted by the emancipation proclamation?

free african americans were allowed to fight for the confederacy.

free african americans were allowed to enlist in the union army and navy.

enslaved people in border states were allowed to move to the north.

enslaved people in border states were allowed to become confederate citizens.c rgf fy4tku6y htk6u jr jyt6

11-32. the main character in the parable, the forgiving father, whose character remains constant throughout the story, is a picture of god. in telling the story, jesus identifies himself with god in his loving attitude to the lost. the younger son symbolizes the lost (the tax collectors and sinners of that day, luke 15: 1), and the elder brother represents the self-righteous (the pharisees and teachers of the law of that day, luke 15: 2). the major theme of this parable seems not to be so much the conversion of the sinner, as in the previous two parables of luke 15, but rather the restoration of a believer into fellowship with the father. in the first two parables, the owner went out to look for what was lost (luke 15: 1-10), whereas in this story the father waits and watches eagerly for his son's return. we see a progression through the three parables from the relationship of one in a hundred (luke 15: 1-7), to one in ten (luke 15: 8-10), to one in one (luke 15: 11-32), demonstrating god’s love for each individual and his personal attentiveness towards all humanity. we see in this story the graciousness of the father overshadowing the sinfulness of the son, as it is the memory of the father’s goodness that brings the prodigal son to repentance (romans 2: 4).