Your friend says scientific theories cannot be believed because they are always changing. wwhat can you say to counter the argument?

scientific theories are mostly approved after they have been researched fully and can be backed up with evidence.

Explanation:It is less unlikely that the theory will change except that it can be improved when the new evidence is discovered due to the fact that they are based on discovered evidence.

Theory of gravity for example there is a proven evidence that there is a pulling force knows as the force of gravity that keeps us from floating on earth whereas in space the lack of that force causes one to float this is backed up by evidence that are visible and can be tested all over again.

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest