Should there be real world consequences for what someone posts on social media? using what you learned in the lesson, write an effective hook to introduce your topic and get your audience's attention. write in complete sentences and state the hook strategy you chose to use.

(what the paragraph should be like)

Should we let people get away with crime or hurting others? if you don't want that to happen then there should be real world consequences for what someone post on social media. This is because if someone post about commiting a crime they should be punished for attempting or planning of said crime. Another reason this needs to happen is because if someone were to use social media to cyberbully someone there should be consequences for the danger they put that person in.

b

explanation:

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)