In comparing and contrasting information from these two sources which of these is an accurate analysis?

In comparing and contrasting information from these two sources the option that is an accurate analysis is Source 1 explains a specific concern of urban agriculture. Source 2 makes a general statement about urban agriculture safety.

Explanation:

The two sources of information are referring to the same topic but from very different points of view, it seems to be that source 1 is against and source 2 is on favor of it, after comparing and contrasting it concludes that they are giving a negative reason why it shouldn't be happening (source 1) and given positive data of the real process (source 2)

its hard for me to see which word is supposed to be in bold. if i knew then i would be able to better.