Which revision correctly combines these two sentences?

there was a lot of traffic today. it took an hour to get home.

a)there was a lot of traffic today it took an hour to get home.
b)there was a lot of traffic today; it took an hour to get home.
c)there was a lot of traffic today and it took an hour to get home.
d)there was a lot of traffic today, it took an hour to get home.

Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.

Based on the text and the map, which labeled location sends products to shihr? the travels of marco polo and study the map.

Ikeep getting differentand provide an explanation! even if it's a minor read the sample student claim."i strongly feel that advertising should be banned during children's television shows." is this an effective claim? a. yes, because it offers an opinion that everyone believes to be true. b. yes, because it expresses an indisputable statement of fact. c. no, because it does not offer an opinion that can be argued against. d. no, because it only expresses a personal preference or feeling.