When and where should society draw the line between what we can do and what we technological advances? should do in regards to

If I'm understanding this correctly... see below explanation.

Explanation:

Society's ability to improve and advance within all fields is without limitation. Our wildest dreams can be achieved through steady research and ambitious thinkers. However, technological advances sometimes strike controversy. For example, medical advances might be in the works to cure cancer by cloning healthy tissue and cells, and distributing those healthy materials to organs, in order to heal them. This amazing medical discovery could turn dark or be considered unethical, very easily. Consider cloning in general. Would you like to clone a deceased family member to allow them to live once more? It sounds great, but in reality.. you would be working against the natural order of life, religious views, ethical stances. Not only that, but your new clone would merely resemble your relative's physical characteristics. The mind and personality would be completely different. But it is all up to you...

the answer is a.

explanation:

the clause "looking toward the south" modifies "a funnel cloud." it's not really the cloud that's "looking," but grammatically, that clause is modifying the cloud.

from the political point of view it could be said that the candidate   is an effective speaker because she takes a strong position on the issue. it is an open discussion but probably she is making a presentation and can choose which subjects she wants to address. she is very likely to attain her aim which is to convince voters to accept her proposal.