Read the excerpt from fast food nation. at taco bell restaurants the food is "assembled," not prepared. the guacamole isn’t made by workers in the kitchen; it’s made at a factory in michoacán, mexico, then frozen and shipped north. the chain’s taco meat arrives frozen and precooked in vacuum-sealed plastic bags. the beans are dehydrated and look like brownish corn flakes. the cooking process is fairly simple. "everything’s add water," a taco bell employee told me. "just add hot water." the taco bell employee’s quote supports schlosser’s argument in this excerpt because it provides personal opinions about the working conditions in fast food restaurants. the reader visualize teenagers working in fast food restaurants. provides expert testimony about the nutritional quality of fast food. emphasizes the obsession with consistency and standardization in the fast food industry.

Emphasizes the obsession with consistency and standardization in the fast food industry

It emphasizes these by describing how all the food is sent elsewhere and shipped to the individual restaurants. If the individual restaurants were to cook the food, it would be liable to regional differences, employee skill differences, etc. whereas by outsourcing all ingredients to the same people, standardization is ensured.

Emphasizes the obsession with consistency and standardization in the fast food industry

It emphasizes these by describing how all the food is sent elsewhere and shipped to the individual restaurants. If the individual restaurants were to cook the food, it would be liable to regional differences, employee skill differences, etc. whereas by outsourcing all ingredients to the same people, standardization is ensured.

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war

there mad at that place