I’m hardcore failing this ,, can someone revive me

20 points and brainliest plz . 2 based on the initial facts of the case, make an inference or an educated guess as to who you believe is the person guilty of defacing the andrew wyeth painting. explain your reasoning. 3 what additional facts or clues did you gather in part 2 of the story? state at least three additional relevant facts or clues you learned in part 2 of the story. 4. why is mrs. williams clearly the guilty party in this case? what motivated her to ruin the wyeth painting? explain how the facts of the case led you to this final deduction.

Read the excerpt from a student’s journal. i thought it would be stressful having to participate in a debate for my final exam. but with a partner to , it was actually a nice change of pace. we argued our case thoroughly, presenting lots of evidence. we even got to use the rebuttal we’d rehearsed. well, a year’s worth of research really paid off. which phrase from the passage best supports the conclusion that the student is describing a policy debate? argued our case thoroughly presenting lots of evidence the rebuttal we’d rehearsed a year’s worth of research

Because genetics is now progressing so rapidly, it is revolutionizing medical research. identify the subordinate clause in the sentence. a) is now progressing b) is now progressing so rapidly c) it is revolutionizing medical research d)