Read the excerpt from "a defense of veganism":

the next claim made against veganism is that a vegan diet does not provide enough protein. without meat or eggs, the argument goes, a person cannot get enough amino acids. this is absolutely untrue. mnn poses an interesting breakdown of a day's protein consumption for vegans based on the u. s. department of agriculture's dietary guidelines. according to these guidelines, an adult male needs 56 grams, and an adult woman needs 46 grams of protein. by putting together a sample breakfast, lunch, and dinner composed of such foods as soy derivatives, bulgur wheat, lentils, nuts, and beans, the average daily protein needs can be easily met.

how does the author address the counterclaim in this excerpt?

a. by listing reasons why people do not need large amounts of protein

b. by citing research about the amount of protein in vegan foods

c. by providing reasons why vegetarian sources do not provide enough protein

d. by using an analogy to the reader understand protein

B. By citing research about the amount of protein in vegan foods. Apex.

Explanation:

B.By citing research about the amount of protein in vegan foods

Explanation:

It is common to find research works, class assignments, etc., without any  quote or bibliographic reference that tells us where the information was extracted from  Author. Many people consider that quoting authors would show that their text does not  It is totally original, subtracting, (according to your point of view), merit to your work. Nothing  farther from reality. A good scientific work is one that is well  documented. Correct use of citations, and the inclusion of references  bibliographic references, (better known as bibliography at the end of the work), show no  only the honesty of the person in recognizing that the work has not left his mind,  If not also that that person has been documented, has read the main  previous contributions of people better knowledgeable about the subject, and therefore the  document has been subjected to careful study.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

an interrogative sentence is a type of sentence that asks a question, as opposed to sentences that make a statement, deliver a command, or express an exclamation. interrogative sentences are typically marked by inversion of the subject and predicate; that is, the first verb in a verb phrase appears before the hope i