The author's main claim is that a diet rich in vegetables, whole grains, and beans can prevent cancer. which two sentences from the passage best support this claim?

First off the answer for this catchy question is the second sentence which by the way it's intentionally hidden, has an intended punctuation error or a non-intended briefly slip because of the comma that should never be written down there, in other words:

# 1 sentence: The author's claim is that (of) a diet rich in vegetables/(Wrong option since it never ends up saying the sentence's objective nor the rest; so it's incomplete)

# 2 sentence: Whole grains(,) and beans can help prevent cancer.(Correct option)

yes, it can be both.

b)metaphor

explanation:

when reading the sentence carefully it says,"hope is a thing with feathers" it's like saying: hope is a thing like feathers

get what i'm saying? instead of using a smilie like or as they use "with"

it would be nice enough if i got .