Asap
imagine a public debate over whether or not some large trees in a local park should be removed in favor of small trees. what type of appeal is being used in the example below?

planting small trees is not the answer because they will not provide the same amount of shade in the park.

logos

ethos

pathos

imagine a public debate over whether or not some large trees in a local park should be removed in favor of small trees. what type of appeal is being used in the example below?

if these magnificent trees are removed, our beautiful park will be utterly ruined!

ethos

logos

pathos

faulty parallelism is a grammar construction where there is no balance in the parts of a sentence they have a similar meaning but the grammar structure is not equivalent.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

jefferson wrote the declaration of independence, and he was the nation's third president.

the problem with the first version is that the sentence:

"jefferson was both the writer of the declaration of independence"

presents jefferson as both a subject and an agent for the verb "write" because if he was "the writer" then the declaration of independence was written by him, besides that fact, the sentence presents a dependent clause.

while the second sentence:

he was the nation's third president.

presents a basic subject+verb+object structure

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in both sentences:

jefferson wrote the declaration of independence, and he was the nation third president.

faith or loyalty when pledged in a solemn agreement or undertaking.

yes, no, maybe, so i honestly don't know best of luck