Read the following paragraph from the article. lee's slender, pulitzer prize-winning novel proved enduring enough to overcome the popularity of hefty epics adapted as blockbuster movie franchises (the rowling and tolkien works) or for tv ("outlander"). even "pride and prejudice," the 200-year-old inspiration for numerous tv and movie versions, and with an army of "janeites" devoted to austen and her work, couldn't best lee's novel. what can be inferred from this paragraph?

idk

explanation:

the sentence does not violate the phrase structure second rule (introduced by noam chomsky) because noun phrases consist of a determiner such as a, the or every, and a noun. in the sentence, the noun phrase the cake includes a determiner (the) and a noun (cake).

on the other hand, the first rule indicates that a sentence encloses a noun phrase, followed by a verb phrase. the example sentence can be analysed as follows:

john (n) + ate (v) + the (det) + cake (n).

not exaxtly

explanation: it depends on the situation like if u do something good there will be good consequences which arent punishments but if you do somthing bad there will be bad consequences which are punishements.

i think that it is letter d.