Read this excerpt from "the selling of joseph" that offers a justification for slavery and answer the question. obj.1 these blackamores are of the posterity of cham, and therefore are under the curse of slavery. gen.9.25,26,7. which statement does not refute the claim made by this reasoning? few know the conditions of this curse of cham or canaan. canaan actually received the curse instead of cham. blackamores are descendents of cush who settled in ethiopia. blackamores spread to many countries throughout africa.

wheres the options? i dont think this can be solved with out the options

the answer would be, she updates her online profiles regularly and participates in work-related online discussions.

constantly changes their schedule.

always on phone a lot more than normal.

bearing in mind that painting during the 1700s was a medium used by the artists at courts in order to depict the kings or queens' portraits as well as their power and influence, the painting of king louis xiv as shown in sugar changed the world supports this claim. in this painting it is possible to observe three examples of wealth, power, and influence.

the king is wearing elaborate clothing made of fancy materials.

the king has a sword and sits next to a helmet.

the king sits next to a crown, which symbolizes his power.

wearing expensive clothes, carrying a sword and posing next to a crown are symbols of wealth, power and influence which clearly represent the importance of monarchy during those times.